Analysis Finds Over 40 Trump Administration Nominees Hold Strong Links to Gas Sector
According to a new analysis, numerous of people with backgrounds in the energy field have been positioned within the existing government, featuring more than 40 who earlier worked directly for coal firms.
Overview of the Report
The report investigated the profiles of appointees and appointees working in the White House and several national offices overseeing environmental matters. These encompass major organizations like the Environmental Protection Agency, the Interior Department, and the Department of Energy.
Broader Policy Context
This review emerges amid persistent efforts to roll back climate regulations and clean energy programs. For example, new legislation have unlocked vast sections of public territory for mining and phased out backing for sustainable power.
With the firehose of terrible things that have transpired on the climate side... it’s crucial to remind the citizens that these are not just measures from the vague, ginormous thing that is the leadership generally, said a author engaged in the study. It is commonly particular players originating from particular powerful interests that are implementing this damaging anti-regulatory plan.
Significant Results
Authors found 111 employees whom they considered as energy sector veterans and renewable energy opponents. That includes 43 officials who were previously serving by oil enterprises. Included in them are well-known top executives including the energy secretary, who earlier served as top executive of a hydraulic fracturing company.
This group furthermore includes lower-profile government staff. For instance, the department overseeing energy efficiency is led by a previous gas executive. Likewise, a top policy advisor in the administration has served in senior jobs at prominent oil firms.
Further Ties
Another 12 officials were found to have ties to energy-financed rightwing research groups. Those encompass ex- members and fellows of organizations that have strongly fought renewable energy and promoted the expansion of fossil fuels.
A total of 29 other appointees are previous business executives from manufacturing sectors whose activities are intimately tied to oil and gas. Further personnel have associations with energy companies that market traditional energy or government representatives who have advocated pro-gas initiatives.
Agency Focus
Analysts identified that 32 staff at the Interior Department by themselves have ties to extractive energy, establishing it as the highest influenced national department. That features the secretary of the office, who has long taken oil funding and functioned as a bridge between fossil fuel sector contributors and the government.
Political Finance
Fossil fuel donors donated significant money to the election initiative and swearing-in. After taking office, the administration has not only established industry-friendly policies but also designed benefits and exceptions that benefit the industry.
Qualifications Concerns
Alongside industry-linked candidates, the analysts noted several administration officials who were selected to key positions with minimal or no pertinent expertise.
Those individuals may not be tied to oil and gas so directly, but their inexperience is dangerous, said a co-author. It’s reasonable to think they will be easily influenced, or vulnerable targets, for the energy sector’s objectives.
As an example, the appointee to lead the Environmental Protection Agency’s division of chief legal officer has very little court history, having not once tried a lawsuit to completion, never taken a sworn statement, and nor presented a legal request.
During a separate case, a White House assistant working on energy matters arrived to the job after serving in roles separate to the sector, with no apparent relevant energy industry or regulatory experience.
White House Reaction
A official for the administration rejected the analysis, stating that the leadership’s personnel are highly competent to implement on the people’s mandate to increase national energy output.
Historical and Present Context
This leadership oversaw a significant array of deregulatory actions during its initial period. During its present tenure, prepared with conservative plans, it has overseen a much more extensive and more aggressive crackdown on ecological regulations and clean power.
There’s no shame, said a analyst. The administration is eager and ready to go out there and promote the fact that they are performing favors for the oil and gas sector, extractive industry, the mining business.